eโบeโป โ ฮผโบฮผโป Annihilation
The complete tree-level calculation: from Feynman diagram to total cross section
4.1 The Process and Its Feynman Diagram
We compute the simplest QED scattering process: an electron and positron annihilate into a muon-antimuon pair. At tree level, there is exactly one Feynman diagram โ the s-channel, where the $e^+e^-$ pair annihilates into a virtual photon which then creates the $\mu^+\mu^-$ pair.
We label the momenta as: $e^-(p_1) + e^+(p_2) \to \mu^-(p_3) + \mu^+(p_4)$. Since $m_\mu \gg m_e$, we work in the limit $m_e = 0$ but keep $m_\mu$ general initially, then take the high-energy limit $s \gg m_\mu^2$ at the end.
๐กWhy Only One Diagram?
Unlike eโบeโป โ eโบeโป (Bhabha scattering), there is no t-channel diagram here because the electron cannot emit a photon and turn into a muon โ lepton flavor is conserved at each QED vertex. The photon must carry the full center-of-mass energy, making this a clean probe of the electromagnetic interaction.
4.2 Writing the Amplitude from Feynman Rules
Reading the diagram from right to left, the QED Feynman rules give us:
Electron vertex: The incoming electron ($u(p_1)$) and positron ($\bar{v}(p_2)$) couple to the photon via $-ie\gamma^\mu$. The electron current is:
Photon propagator: The virtual photon with momentum $q = p_1 + p_2$ contributes (in Feynman gauge):
Muon vertex: The outgoing muon ($\bar{u}(p_3)$) and antimuon ($v(p_4)$) give:
Assembling the amplitude: Contracting everything together:
or equivalently:
4.3 Squaring the Amplitude and Spin Sums
For unpolarized beams and unobserved final-state spins, we compute the spin-averaged squared amplitude:
The factor 1/4 comes from averaging over the two spin states of each initial particle (electron and positron). Writing out $|\mathcal{M}|^2 = \mathcal{M}\mathcal{M}^*$:
Using the identity $[\bar{\psi}_1 \Gamma \psi_2]^* = \bar{\psi}_2 \gamma^0 \Gamma^\dagger \gamma^0 \psi_1 = \bar{\psi}_2 \bar{\Gamma} \psi_1$ where$\bar{\Gamma} = \gamma^0 \Gamma^\dagger \gamma^0$ (and $\overline{\gamma^\nu} = \gamma^\nu$), the spin sums factorize into two independent traces using the completeness relations:
The electron-side spin sum becomes a trace (setting $m_e = 0$):
The muon-side spin sum (keeping $m_\mu$):
The full spin-summed result is:
4.4 Evaluating the Traces
Electron trace: Using $\text{Tr}[\gamma^\alpha\gamma^\beta\gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu] = 4(g^{\alpha\beta}g^{\mu\nu} - g^{\alpha\mu}g^{\beta\nu} + g^{\alpha\nu}g^{\beta\mu})$:
Muon trace: Expanding $(\not{p}_3 + m_\mu)\gamma^\mu(\not{p}_4 - m_\mu)\gamma^\nu$, the terms with odd numbers of gamma matrices vanish in the trace. The $m_\mu^2$ term gives $-m_\mu^2 \text{Tr}[\gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu] = -4m_\mu^2 g^{\mu\nu}$. Thus:
Contracting the tensors: We compute $L_{e\,\mu\nu} L_\mu^{\mu\nu}$ by contracting term by term. Using$g_{\mu\nu}g^{\mu\nu} = 4$ in 4 dimensions:
After careful bookkeeping, the contraction simplifies to:
๐กTrace Contraction Strategy
The contraction of two rank-2 tensors involves 9 pairs of terms. But symmetry cuts the work: $L_e^{\mu\nu}$ and $L_\mu^{\mu\nu}$ share the same tensor structure (symmetric, traceless part plus trace), so many cross terms simplify. In practice, experienced physicists use Mandelstam variables to bypass the explicit contraction.
4.5 Result in Mandelstam Variables
The Mandelstam variables for this process are:
with the constraint $s + t + u = 2m_\mu^2$ (setting $m_e = 0$). The dot products become:
By momentum conservation, $p_2 \cdot p_3 = p_1 \cdot p_4$ and $p_2 \cdot p_4 = p_1 \cdot p_3$ (in the massless electron limit). Substituting into our trace result:
In the high-energy limit $s \gg m_\mu^2$, we set $m_\mu = 0$ everywhere and use $s + t + u = 0$:
4.6 Differential Cross Section in the CM Frame
In the center-of-mass frame with all particles massless, $|\vec{p}_f| = |\vec{p}_i|$ and the master formula gives:
We express $t$ and $u$ in terms of the scattering angle $\theta$. With $E = \sqrt{s}/2$ for each particle:
Therefore:
Putting it all together and writing $e^2 = 4\pi\alpha$:
This is one of the most celebrated results in QED. The $(1 + \cos^2\theta)$ angular dependence is a direct signature of spin-1/2 particles coupling to a spin-1 mediator.
4.7 Total Cross Section
Integrating over the full solid angle $d\Omega = \sin\theta\, d\theta\, d\phi$:
The $\phi$ integral gives $2\pi$. For the $\theta$ integral, let $x = \cos\theta$:
Therefore:
๐กThe Muon Point Cross Section
This result, $\sigma = 4\pi\alpha^2/(3s)$, is so fundamental that it serves as the "standard candle" of particle physics. At $\sqrt{s} = 10$ GeV, it gives$\sigma \approx 0.87$ nb. All other $e^+e^-$ cross sections are compared to this as a ratio (the R-ratio), which we explore on Page 4. The $1/s$ behavior is universal for point-like fermion pair production.
Key Concepts (Page 1)
- โข eโบeโป โ ฮผโบฮผโป has a single s-channel diagram (lepton flavor conservation)
- โข Feynman rules give M = (-eยฒ/s)[vฬฮณยนu][uฬฮณโฮผv]
- โข Spin averaging: factor of 1/4 for two spin-1/2 initial particles
- โข Completeness relations convert spin sums into traces over gamma matrices
- โข Trace identities: Tr[ฮณ๐ผฮณ๐ฝฮณ๐พฮณ๐ฟ] = 4(g๐ผ๐ฝg๐พ๐ฟ - g๐ผ๐พg๐ฝ๐ฟ + g๐ผ๐ฟg๐ฝ๐พ)
- โข Result: $\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} = \frac{\alpha^2(1 + \cos^2\theta)}{4s}$ and $\sigma = \frac{4\pi\alpha^2}{3s}$