Part V
Clinical Phenotypes
From the first attack (CIS) through relapsing-remitting disease, the transition to secondary progression, and the primary progressive form — the Lublin 2014 framework, the modern PIRA concept, and the differential against NMOSD and MOGAD.
1. The Clinical Continuum of MS
Modern MS is best understood as a single biological process expressed along a continuum of clinical states. The historical splitting of cases into discrete «courses» remains useful for prognosis, communication and trial design, but does not correspond to fundamentally distinct diseases.
~85%
Onset as RRMS
Relapsing-remitting; majority transition over decades to SPMS.
~10%
Onset as PPMS
Primary progressive; gradual disability without distinct relapses.
~5%
Other / variant
Aggressive MS, paediatric, late-onset, tumefactive.
2. Clinically Isolated Syndrome (CIS)
A first clinical episode of CNS demyelination, lasting >24 h, in the absence of fever or infection, in someone not previously known to have MS. CIS is the prototypical «single-attack» presentation; with appropriate MRI and CSF support it now often is diagnostic of MS under McDonald 2017.
- Conversion to MS by 10 years: ~80% if any T2 lesion on baseline MRI; ~20% if MRI normal (Fisniku et al., Brain 2008).
- CHAMPS (Jacobs et al., NEJM 2000) and ETOMS (Comi et al., Lancet 2001) trials demonstrated that early IFN-β reduces conversion to clinically definite MS by ~40%.
- Modern practice: treat CIS with high MRI burden as MS at diagnosis.
3. Radiologically Isolated Syndrome (RIS)
MRI lesions meeting MS dissemination-in-space criteria, found incidentally in someone with no clinical history of demyelinating events. ~30% convert to a clinical first event within 5 years; risk is higher with infratentorial or spinal-cord lesions, gadolinium-enhancing lesions, or positive CSF OCBs.
RIS is not yet formally MS (McDonald 2017), but two recent randomised trials (TERIS with teriflunomide, ARISE with dimethyl fumarate; Lebrun-Frenay et al., JAMA Neurol 2023; Okuda et al., Ann Neurol 2023) showed early DMT delays first clinical event — raising the prospect of treating MS before symptom onset.
4. Relapsing-Remitting MS (RRMS)
The commonest course at onset. Defined by clearly delineated relapses with full or partial recovery, separated by clinical stability. Classical features:
- Relapse — new neurological symptoms or worsening of previous symptoms, lasting >24 h, in the absence of fever or infection (a «true» relapse); pseudo-relapses (Uhthoff phenomenon, infection-driven worsening) must be distinguished.
- Annualised relapse rate (ARR) — modern untreated cohorts ~0.4–0.6; on placebo arms of pivotal trials ~0.3–0.4 (a falling secular trend).
- Recovery — ~85% of relapses recover >75% of deficit within 12 weeks; partial residual is the rule with longer disease duration.
- Activity — relapses + new MRI lesions defines «active» disease in Lublin terminology.
In the pre-DMT era, ~60% of RRMS patients transitioned to SPMS within 20 years; modern long-term registries suggest this fraction is now substantially lower, particularly in patients started early on high-efficacy DMTs (Brown et al., JAMA 2019; Spelman et al., Neurology 2021).
5. Secondary Progressive MS (SPMS)
SPMS is a phase of gradual, irreversible disability accumulation following an initial RRMS course, with or without superimposed relapses or MRI activity. Diagnosis is retrospective: at least 6–12 months of progression, independent of any relapse, in a previously RRMS patient.
- Median time RRMS → SPMS — ~20 years (untreated, London-Ontario cohort); shorter in older-onset patients.
- Pathology — axonal loss, cortical demyelination, meningeal B-cell follicles, slow expansion of chronic active (paramagnetic-rim) lesions.
- DMT efficacy — modest. Siponimod showed a 21% relative reduction in 3-month confirmed disability progression in EXPAND (Kappos et al., Lancet 2018), driven mostly by «active» SPMS.
Modern terminology distinguishes active (relapses or new MRI lesions) versus not-active, and with progression versus without progression, giving four SPMS subtypes that determine eligibility for specific DMTs.
6. Primary Progressive MS (PPMS)
~10–15% of MS cases. Progressive disability accumulation from onset, without preceding relapses. Characteristic features:
- Older onset — mean age ~40, vs ~30 for RRMS.
- Sex ratio — closer to 1:1.
- Typical syndrome — progressive spastic paraparesis with bladder dysfunction, secondary to spinal-cord predominant disease (the «chronic progressive myelopathy» presentation).
- MRI — fewer cerebral T2 lesions than RRMS; cord atrophy prominent.
- CSF — OCBs in ~85–90% (slightly less than RRMS).
ORATORIO (Montalban et al., NEJM 2017) was the first to demonstrate DMT efficacy in PPMS: ocrelizumab reduced 12-week confirmed disability progression by 24% over 120 weeks; the effect was greatest in younger patients with gadolinium-enhancing lesions, suggesting that anti-CD20 works in PPMS via the same mechanism it works in RRMS — suppression of inflammatory activity.
7. The Lublin/Reingold/Kappos 2014 Phenotype Framework
The 2014 revision of MS clinical phenotypes (Lublin et al., Neurology 2014) replaced the older 1996 classification (which included «progressive-relapsing MS») with a two-axis description:
| Course | Activity (relapse / new MRI) | Progression (independent of relapse) |
|---|---|---|
| Relapsing-remitting | Active / Not active | Not progressing |
| Secondary progressive | Active / Not active | With / Without progression |
| Primary progressive | Active / Not active | With / Without progression |
| Clinically isolated syndrome | Active / Not active | n/a |
The framework abandons «progressive-relapsing MS» and unifies progressive courses (primary & secondary) by their shared activity/progression axes. It is now the basis of regulatory labelling in major jurisdictions.
HLA-DRB1*15:01 — the dominant MS-susceptibility allele (PDB 1IEA)
Crystal structure of HLA-DR2 (DRA1*0101 / DRB1*15:01) presenting MBP85-99 (Smith et al., J Exp Med 1998). DRB1*15:01 carries a single-copy odds ratio of ~3 for MS; homozygotes ~6 (additive on the log scale). The structural picture explains how a single class-II groove can generate a quantitatively dominant susceptibility signal across the entire MS phenotype spectrum.
8. PIRA — Progression Independent of Relapse Activity
Modern long-term registries have shown that, even in apparently RRMS patients with very few relapses, a slow accumulation of confirmed disability occurs between relapses. This phenomenon — PIRA — has transformed thinking about progression:
- Kappos et al., JAMA Neurol 2020: pooled OPERA-I/II analysis — ~80% of confirmed disability accumulation in RRMS was independent of relapses.
- Implication: progression is not exclusive to SPMS; it is a continuous process underlying RRMS, masked by relapse-driven recovery.
- Mechanism: chronic compartmentalised inflammation, paramagnetic-rim lesions, cortical pathology, slow neurodegeneration.
- Therapeutic target: BTK inhibitors are designed primarily for PIRA / smouldering disease.
9. Paediatric, Late-Onset & Aggressive MS
- Paediatric MS — ~3–5% of cases. Almost always RRMS; relapses ~2–3× more frequent than in adults; cognitive impact disproportionate.
- Late-onset MS (> 50 yr) — ~5%. Higher proportion of PPMS; less responsive to DMT; more comorbidity; differential against vascular small-vessel disease and CADASIL.
- Aggressive MS — rapid disability accrual (≥ EDSS 4 within 5 years). Definition heterogeneous. Trial-based criteria from the European MS Platform inform treatment escalation. Increasingly treated with high-efficacy DMTs from the outset (induction strategy) or autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (AHSCT, MIST trial).
- Tumefactive MS — large (> 2 cm) lesions with mass effect, ring enhancement, sometimes mimicking glioma. May respond dramatically to corticosteroids; biopsy reveals demyelinating, not neoplastic, pathology.
- Marburg variant — rare, fulminant, often fatal subacute demyelination.
- Balo’s concentric sclerosis — concentric rings of demyelination on MRI; pathologically MS, often aggressive.
10. The Differentials — NMOSD & MOGAD
Two distinct demyelinating diseases were carved out of «MS» in the modern era and must be excluded before MS is diagnosed:
| Feature | MS | NMOSD (AQP4-IgG) | MOGAD (MOG-IgG) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antibody | None pathogenic | Anti-AQP4 | Anti-MOG |
| Optic neuritis | Unilateral, mild-moderate | Severe, often bilateral, posterior | Bilateral, with optic-disc swelling |
| Myelitis | Short (< 2 segments), partial, dorsal | Longitudinally extensive (≥ 3 segments), central | Longitudinally extensive often |
| CSF OCBs | >95% | ~20% | ~10% |
| DMT response | Standard MS DMTs work | Worsened by some MS DMTs (IFN-β, fingolimod, natalizumab); treated with eculizumab, satralizumab, inebilizumab, rituximab | Steroids, IVIG, rituximab; some MS DMTs may worsen |
Misdiagnosis of NMOSD or MOGAD as MS exposes patients to ineffective and sometimes harmful therapy. Modern practice is to test AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG (cell-based assays) at presentation in any «MS-like» optic-neuritis or myelitis with atypical features.