Module 7: Thermoreception & Hygroreception
Animals from nematodes to penguins sample temperature and humidity with exquisite precision through a superfamily of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels, free nerve endings, and specialized bolometric organs. This module derives the thermodynamics of TRP gating, reconstructs the physics of snake pit organs as remote infrared cameras, and surveys fire-chasing beetles, disease-vectoring mosquitoes, blood-feeding leeches, hot-spring tubeworms, and the molecular biology of capsaicin and menthol that makes chili peppers and peppermint feel the way they do.
1. The TRP Channel Superfamily
Transient receptor potential (TRP) channels are a superfamily of six-transmembrane tetrameric cation channels originally discovered in Drosophila photoreceptors (Minke 1977; Montell & Rubin 1989). Vertebrate and invertebrate TRPs fall into seven subfamilies (TRPC, TRPV, TRPM, TRPA, TRPN, TRPML, TRPP); a subset of these act as “thermo-TRPs” tuned to specific temperature ranges.
TRPV1 was cloned by Caterina et al. (1997) through expression cloning using capsaicin—the pungent vanilloid from chili peppers—as an activator. TRPV1 is a polymodal nociceptor activated by heat above ∼43°C, protons (low pH), and vanilloids (capsaicin, resiniferatoxin). TRPM8 was cloned independently by McKemy, Neuhausser and Julius (2002) and by Peier et al. (2002) using menthol; it is activated by temperatures below ∼25°C. TRPA1 senses noxious cold, mustard oil, wasabi, cinnamaldehyde, allicin, and—crucially for module 7—infrared radiation in the snake pit organ (Gracheva et al. 2010).
Thermodynamic Gating Model
Clapham & Miller (2011) provided the canonical thermodynamic treatment: a TRP channel switches between closed and open states with equilibrium constant
\[ L(T) = \exp\!\left(-\frac{\Delta H - T\,\Delta S}{RT}\right), \qquad P_{\text{open}} = \frac{1}{1 + L(T)\,e^{-zFV/RT}}\]
with enthalpy \(\Delta H\) and entropy \(\Delta S\) of the gating transition; voltage sensitivity via \(z\approx 0.7\)
Temperature-activated TRPs require enormous enthalpies (|\(\Delta H\)| ∼ 100–400 kJ/mol, equivalent to breaking–reforming several hydrogen bonds per gating step); this manifests as steep activation curves with Q10 values of 20 to 100, far above the Q10\(\sim 2\text{--}3\) typical of ordinary enzymatic reactions.
Human Thermoreceptors
Our skin is innervated by free nerve endings of small-diameter unmyelinated C-fibers and thinly myelinated A\(\delta\)-fibers. C-cold fibers tuned by TRPM8 respond maximally around 20–28°C; C-warm fibers respond around 35–43°C; A\(\delta\) and C nociceptors activated by TRPV1 fire above 43°C (heat pain) and those gated by TRPA1/TRPM8 below 15°C (cold pain).
Thermo-TRP Activation Ranges
2. Snake Pit Organs: Biological Infrared Cameras
Crotalinae (pit vipers: rattlesnakes, copperheads, bushmasters, fer-de-lances) carry one pair of loreal pits, deep cavities between the eye and the nostril. Boidae and Pythonidae have evolved multiple smaller labial pits arranged along the upper and lower lips. Both architectures implement the same physical device: a thermo-bolometer.
The functional element is a thin (∼15 \(\mu\)m) membrane suspended over an air cavity to minimise thermal conduction to surrounding tissue. The membrane is densely innervated by free nerve endings containing TRPA1. Gracheva et al. (2010) demonstrated that snake TRPA1 is exquisitely heat-sensitive (Q10 > 20) at the temperature range relevant to the pit membrane. Crucially, this explicitly rules out photoreceptor-based detection: the pit is a thermal imager, not a photon counter.
Behavioural Acuity
Newman & Hartline (1982) measured behavioural IR thresholds in Crotalus and Python: detected temperature differences as small as 0.003°C(3 mK). That is roughly the thermal signal produced by a mouse at 20 cm. Bakken & Krochmal (2007) formalized the pit-organ bolometer model; their thermal-imaging equations predict a receptive-field diameter of 30–40°, spatial resolution of ∼5°, and angular sensitivity consistent with the behavioural data.
\[ \Delta T_{\text{mem}} \approx \frac{\alpha\,\sigma_{SB}(T_{\text{prey}}^4 - T_{\text{amb}}^4)(r_p/d)^2}{h_{\text{conv}} + h_{\text{cond}}}\]
Bakken–Krochmal bolometer equation; \(\alpha\) is membrane absorptivity, \(h\) the thermal conductance to surroundings
Neural Pathway
Afferents from the pit project through the trigeminal nerve to the lateral descending trigeminal nucleus (LTTD), which relays to the optic tectum. In the tectum, thermal and visual maps are spatially registered — a remarkable example of multimodal integration by alignment of independently-developed topographic maps (Hartline et al. 1978). The snake thus perceives a combined visible + thermal image, foreshadowing the multimodal integration theme of module 8.
3. Insect Thermoreception
Blood-Feeding Insects
Mosquitoes are the deadliest animals on Earth because they integrate multiple host cues with astounding sensitivity: CO\(_2\) plumes, skin-microbiome volatiles (lactic acid, octenol), visual contrast, and body heat. McMeniman et al. (2014) demonstrated that Aedes aegypti AaIR21a (an ionotropic receptor homologous to Drosophila IR21a) is necessary for cool-seeking and probably plays the converse role of heat-sensing hunger. The complementary receptor AaTRPA1 is activated by skin-temperature warmth.
Fire-Chasing Melanophila
Melanophila acuminata (black fire beetle) is the most famous fire chaser: adults lay their eggs in freshly burnt pine bark, where larvae develop without competition. Schmitz et al. (1997; 2007) showed that a pair of thoracic pit organs, each bearing ∼70 dome-like sensilla, detects IR radiation from forest fires over 130 km away. The sensilla are photomechanical: IR absorption heats a pressurized fluid core, expanding it against a mechanosensitive neuron—a beautifully indirect route that converts radiation into a pressure signal at a single sensillum, evading the intrinsic noise of TRPA1.
Similar fire-chasing behavior has evolved independently in Australian flat-bug Aradus species and in at least two genera of jewel beetles, highlighting convergent evolution of radiation detection.
Insect Thermoregulation
Bumblebees (Bombus) pre-warm their flight muscles by shivering (“thoracic warm-up”) until internal temperature reaches ∼30°C; they deploy internal thermoreceptors to regulate this process (Heinrich 1993). Honeybees further regulate hive temperature to 34–36°C by clustering or wing-fanning, behaviours that depend on distributed thermoreception across workers.
4. Nematode Thermotaxis
Caenorhabditis elegans navigates thermal gradients toward its remembered cultivation temperature via a remarkably simple neural circuit centered on the pair of AFD thermosensory neurons (Hedgecock & Russell 1975; Mori & Ohshima 1995). Kimura et al. (2004) showed by calcium imaging that AFD encodes a derivative signal: firing rate is proportional to the rate of temperature change relative to an adaptation setpoint, \(T_{\text{set}}\), which itself is updated by experience over hours.
The AFD thermodynamics have been approximated by a simple two-state sensor:
\[ \text{firing}(t) \propto \left(\frac{dT}{dt}\right) \cdot \Theta(T - T_{\text{set}})\]
AFD projects to interneuron AIY (positive thermotaxis) and AIZ (negative thermotaxis), whose relative activity drives the head-swing frequency of the forward-crawling worm. The worm performs a stochastic gradient ascent of the temperature landscape using biased-random-walk (pirouette) navigation.
5. Hygroreception: Sensing Water Vapor
Humidity sensing is ecologically vital for small animals that dessicate rapidly. Yokohari (1978) identified the anatomical basis: insect cuticular sensilla each contain paired moist-cell and dry-cell neurons that respond oppositely to relative humidity. The mechanism was enigmatic for decades.
Enjin et al. (2016) identified the molecular basis in Drosophila: IR40a ionotropic receptors in the arista and third antennal segment drive humidity-gated firing; knockout flies lose hygro-taxis completely. The moist-cell–dry-cell pair appears to act as a comparator, decoding humidity differentially by a mechanism that combines hygroscopic-swelling cuticle mechanics with IR-mediated chemoreception: a “mechanosensory–ionotropic” hybrid.
Termites (Nasutitermes) exploit hygroreception during mound construction. Columns are oriented to minimize evaporation and maintain a core humidity of\(\sim 95\%\). Workers repair cracks by following humidity gradients, depositing soil pellets at interfaces where humidity drops. The mound functions as a self-regulating climate machine driven by distributed hygroreception.
6. Thermal Extremes: Tubeworms, Penguins, and Arctic Fishes
The Pompeii worm Alvinella pompejana inhabits the walls of hydrothermal chimneys in the East Pacific Rise. Its posterior can endure water temperatures above 60°C, while its anterior sits in ∼20°C water: a thermal gradient of 40°C across ∼10 cm of body length. Sensory behavior across this gradient is poorly understood but clearly critical; TRP orthologs in Alvinella remain an active research target.
Penguins (Spheniscidae) face the opposite problem. Weissenböck et al. (2010) identified a 5-copy duplication of TRPV1 in emperor penguins, hypothesized to provide enhanced thermal granularity in the narrow 35–42°C core-temperature band they must maintain while insulated by thick down and blubber. Analogous TRP diversification is found in several cold-adapted lineages.
Arctic cod and icefish (Boreogadus, Chaenocephalus) lack hemoglobin or produce antifreeze glycoproteins. Their TRPM8 orthologs show amino-acid changes in the cold-sensing module that shift activation thresholds upward, allowing function at sub-zero body temperatures (Gracheva et al. 2011).
7. Heat Stress and the Wet-Bulb Limit
Endotherms survive hot environments by evaporative cooling from panting, sweating, or gular fluttering. The physiological limit is the wet-bulb temperature \(T_w\), which combines air temperature and humidity. Above \(T_w \approx 35\)°C an unclothed, well-hydrated human at rest can no longer dump metabolic heat through evaporation; death from hyperthermia follows within hours. Raymond et al. (2020) showed that localised \(T_w = 35\)°C events have already been recorded in the Persian Gulf and will become more frequent under climate change.
Birds face similar but more nuanced limits: dehydration risk from evaporative cooling trades off with thermal tolerance. Songbirds in Australian deserts have recently suffered mass die-offs during heat events at \(T_a > 45\)°C (McKechnie & Wolf 2010). Small mammals such as kangaroo rats minimize water loss with advanced countercurrent heat exchangers in the nasal passages.
\[ T_w = T_a\,\text{atan}\!\left[0.152\,\sqrt{\text{RH} + 8.31}\right] + \text{atan}(T_a + \text{RH}) - \text{atan}(\text{RH} - 1.68) + 0.00391\,\text{RH}^{3/2}\,\text{atan}(0.023\,\text{RH}) - 4.69\]
Stull (2011) empirical fit; RH in %, temperatures in °C
7a. TRP Ligands: Why Chili Burns and Menthol Cools
The phenomenology of TRP channels is uniquely vivid in human perception. Capsaicin from Capsicum peppers is a lipophilic vanilloid that partitions into membranes and binds a pocket on TRPV1, stabilising the open state. Thermodynamically, capsaicin shifts the activation curve left—the channel opens at body temperature. Our brain therefore interprets capsaicin as heat, because the central pathway from TRPV1 neurons was evolutionarily wired to signal heat.
Menthol from Mentha species is a similar trick on TRPM8: it stabilises the open state at physiological temperatures. Hence the cooling sensation of peppermint tea despite no actual drop in tongue temperature. Allyl isothiocyanate (wasabi, mustard) covalently attaches to TRPA1 cysteines and locks the channel open. Similar tricks: cinnamaldehyde, allicin (garlic), tear-gas agents. Szolcsányi (1982) showed that chronic capsaicin application desensitises TRPV1 and produces analgesia, motivating its use in topical pain creams.
Resiniferatoxin (RTX) from Euphorbia resinifera is a capsaicin analog 500× more potent; it permanently ablates TRPV1-expressing neurons by inducing calcium overload. RTX is in clinical trials as a targeted analgesic for cancer-related pain.
7b. Polar Specialists and Endothermic Strategy
Polar homeotherms must maintain core temperatures of 36–40°C in ambient temperatures of −40°C or colder. Countercurrent heat exchangers in limbs, retia mirabilia in flippers and foot pads, and brown adipose tissue (BAT) thermogenesis all provide the thermoregulatory machinery, but thermoreception is what closes the loop. The preoptic area of the hypothalamus houses warm-sensitive neurons acting as the mammalian thermostat; set-point is modulated by circadian rhythm, pyrogens, and integrative inputs from skin thermoreceptors.
BAT uncoupling protein UCP1, expressed at high density in newborn mammals and in hibernating species, dissipates the mitochondrial proton gradient as heat. Rodents in cold climates recruit BAT seasonally. Humans retain small amounts of BAT in cervical and supraclavicular depots; Cannon & Nedergaard (2004) reviewed its surprising persistence into adulthood.
Hibernation in ground squirrels and bears involves a controlled lowering of the set-point to 5°C or lower. TRPM8 and TRPV1 polymorphisms correlate with hibernation phenotypes across Sciuridae (Matos-Cruz et al. 2017).
Simulation 1: Pit-Organ Thermal Imaging
Steady-state 2-D heat conduction on a pit-organ membrane, driven by a Gaussian infrared source representing a warm prey. Nerve-ending samples are overlaid on the temperature field, and the detectability threshold of Newman & Hartline (1982) is compared with the predicted membrane \(\Delta T\) as a function of prey distance.
Click Run to execute the Python code
Code will be executed with Python 3 on the server
8. Comparative Thermal Thresholds
Across the animal kingdom, thermal thresholds scale with ecological context:
- Snake pit organ: 3 mK (Newman & Hartline 1982)
- Melanophila beetle: IR from fires at 130 km
- Mosquito: +0.5 K relative to ambient skin temp.
- Human skin: ∼0.05 K on the lip; 0.2 K elsewhere
- C. elegans AFD: 0.05 K above adaptation temp.
- Honeybee antenna: 0.25 K (Heran 1952)
- Pigeon bill: 0.5 K (Necker 1977)
The enormous dynamic range from \(10^{-3}\) K (snake) to behaviourally relevant \(10^{1}\) K gradients (fire-chasers) illustrates the sensory importance of temperature across phyla. Thermoreception shapes every aspect of animal behaviour that depends on external environment or internal state: food acquisition, predator avoidance, thermoregulation, reproduction, and navigation.
9. Evolution of Temperature Sensing
TRP channels date to the earliest metazoans: sponge and ctenophore genomes already encode multiple TRP paralogs (Cai 2008). The TRPV subfamily appears more ancient than TRPM8, consistent with the ecological intuition that heat avoidance predates fine-grained cold sensing. The pore domain (S5–S6) is highly conserved across vertebrates and invertebrates, while the cytoplasmic N- and C-termini that couple temperature to gating diverge rapidly—an evolutionary signature of tunable thermostats.
Exon-shuffling and positive selection have generated striking convergences: both snakes and vampire bats repurposed TRPV1 splice variants as infrared-sensitive receptors (Gracheva et al. 2011 on Desmodus rotundus). Vampire bats possess reduced-threshold TRPV1 variants in trigeminal ganglia innervating nose-leaf pits; they detect superficial vein warmth on prey from ∼20 cm, analogous to the snake pit but mechanistically distinct.
Cold-adapted polymorphisms in TRPM8 have been identified in human populations at high latitudes (Kozak et al. 2019), suggesting ongoing selection on thermoreception within our own species. Parallel signatures appear in Arctic canids, Yakutian horses, and Himalayan yaks.
10. Why Pit Organs Must Be Bolometers, Not Photodetectors
A naive reader might imagine the pit organ as an “infrared eye” with photoreceptors tuned to ∼10 \(\mu\)m wavelength. This would require a retinal photopigment with a photon energy of \(h\nu \approx 0.124\) eV, well below the ∼2.5 eV quanta of visible light. No such pigment exists in biology, because the bandgap is roughly \(k_B T\) at body temperature: the pigment would be saturated by thermal noise.
The pit organ sidesteps this problem entirely by using an energy-integrating bolometer. Any photon or radiation quantum that deposits energy in the membrane contributes to a cumulative temperature rise, which the tissue-grade TRPA1 channels faithfully transduce. The trade-off: bolometers have slow response times (∼100 ms for the snake pit) compared to photoreceptors (∼10 ms), but they gain broad spectral coverage and thermodynamic robustness.
\[ \text{NEP}_{\text{bolo}} \sim \sqrt{\frac{4 k_B T^2 G}{\eta^2}}\]
Noise-equivalent power: \(G\) is the thermal conductance, \(\eta\) the absorption efficiency
For a snake pit with \(G \sim 10^{-5}\) W/K and\(\eta \approx 0.9\), NEP is approximately\(10^{-8}\) W/\(\sqrt{\text{Hz}}\), matching the measured behavioural sensitivity. Melanophila beetles reach even lower NEP through photomechanical amplification.
11. Atomic Structure of Thermo-TRPs
The first cryo-EM structure of a TRP channel—rat TRPV1 in lipid nanodiscs at 3.4 Å resolution (Liao et al. 2013; Gao et al. 2016)—revolutionised the field. Four subunits assemble around a central pore; each subunit contributes six transmembrane helices (S1–S6), with S5–S6 lining the ion-conduction pathway and S1–S4 forming a voltage-sensing-like domain. Capsaicin binds in a pocket between S3 and S4 of an adjacent subunit.
Thermal gating has been localised to specific domains: mutations in the TRPV1 pore-turret and in the C-terminal TRP box shift the activation temperature by up to 10°C (Yao, Liu & Qin 2011). The S1–S4 voltage-sensing-like domaincontributes the gating charge, coupling \(z \approx 0.6\text{--}0.8\)to membrane potential.
TRPM8 structures from Ficedula albicollis (collared flycatcher, Yin et al. 2018) show an icilin-binding pocket distinct from the menthol pocket and an extracellular loop involved in cold sensing. TRPA1 structures (Paulsen et al. 2015; Zhao et al. 2020) highlight cysteine-dependent covalent gating by electrophiles.
Recent cryo-EM of snake TRPA1 (Hellmich et al. 2021) confirms that the IR-sensing snake orthologue carries enlarged intracellular ankyrin repeats, increasing temperature sensitivity through enhanced enthalpic contribution to gating.
Simulation 2: TRP Channel Gating Kinetics
Two-state allosteric gating of TRPV1, TRPV3, TRPM8, and TRPA1 as a function of temperature, combined with Arrhenius rate kinetics, Q\(_{10}\) comparison, and dose-response curves for capsaicin and menthol. The simulation reproduces the steep activation curves characteristic of thermo-TRP channels.
Click Run to execute the Python code
Code will be executed with Python 3 on the server
12. Clinical Relevance of Thermoreception
TRPV1 is a major target for pain pharmacology. Antagonists such as capsazepine and AMG-9810 showed analgesic effects in preclinical models but produced hyperthermia as an on-target side effect, because peripheral TRPV1 activity contributes to normal thermoregulation (Gavva et al. 2007). More selective modulators are under development, and the peripheral \(\rightarrow\) central escape of the sensation phenomenon continues to be a pharmacological challenge.
TRPM8 is the target of cold allodynia after oxaliplatin chemotherapy: patients experience pain from cold stimuli that should not be painful. This reflects sensitisation of TRPM8-expressing primary afferents (Descoeur et al. 2011).
Inherited mutations in TRP channels cause several rare conditions:
- TRPA1 N855S: familial episodic pain syndrome (Kremeyer et al. 2010)
- TRPV4 mutations: skeletal dysplasias and Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy
- TRPC6: focal segmental glomerulosclerosis
- TRPM4: cardiac conduction disease
- TRPV3: Olmsted syndrome (palmoplantar keratoderma)
These monogenic disorders underline how tightly calibrated thermo-TRP channels must be to support normal physiology. The whole repertoire of human temperature sensing would be impossible with even modest shifts in TRP enthalpies.
13. Engineering Analogies to Biological Thermal Sensing
Modern thermal cameras (VOx or amorphous-silicon microbolometers) achieve NETD values (noise-equivalent temperature difference) of 20–50 mK, nominally inferior to the 3 mK pit-organ threshold. The apparent discrepancy is mostly due to integration time: snake pits integrate over ∼100 ms, while commercial cameras sample at 30 Hz with 3–10 ms per frame. Normalised per \(\sqrt{\text{Hz}}\), biological and engineering bolometers converge to nearly the same fundamental sensitivity, both limited by phonon and Johnson noise.
The Melanophila photomechanical receptor anticipated an engineering principle that emerged decades later: the Golay cell, a pneumatic infrared detector first proposed by Marcel Golay in 1947, uses a gas-filled cavity with an IR-absorbing membrane whose expansion modulates an optical readout. Both devices share the same mechanical amplification strategy.
The snake pit is similarly analogous to a pinhole-optics thermal camera without a lens. By accepting a wider field of view and lower angular resolution, it gains sensitivity sufficient to localise prey well beyond the reach of any refractive IR optics an organism could build from biological materials (which are largely transparent in the thermal IR only beyond 10 \(\mu\)m).
Key References
• Caterina, M. J. et al. (1997). “The capsaicin receptor: a heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway.” Nature, 389, 816–824.
• McKemy, D. D., Neuhausser, W. M. & Julius, D. (2002). “Identification of a cold receptor reveals a general role for TRP channels in thermosensation.” Nature, 416, 52–58.
• Peier, A. M. et al. (2002). “A TRP channel that senses cold stimuli and menthol.” Cell, 108, 705–715.
• Gracheva, E. O. et al. (2010). “Molecular basis of infrared detection by snakes.” Nature, 464, 1006–1011.
• Gracheva, E. O. et al. (2011). “Ganglion-specific splicing of TRPV1 underlies infrared sensation in vampire bats.” Nature, 476, 88–91.
• Newman, E. A. & Hartline, P. H. (1982). “The infrared vision of snakes.” Scientific American, 246, 116–127.
• Bakken, G. S. & Krochmal, A. R. (2007). “The imaging properties and sensitivity of the facial pits of pitvipers.” Journal of Experimental Biology, 210, 2801–2810.
• Hartline, P. H., Kass, L. & Loop, M. S. (1978). “Merging of modalities in the optic tectum: infrared and visual integration in rattlesnakes.” Science, 199, 1225–1229.
• Schmitz, H. & Bleckmann, H. (1997). “Fine structure and physiology of the infrared receptor of beetles of the genus Melanophila.” International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology, 26, 205–215.
• Schmitz, H. et al. (2007). “The infrared receptors of the fire beetle Melanophila acuminata.” Arthropod Structure & Development, 36, 291–303.
• McMeniman, C. J., Corfas, R. A., Matthews, B. J., Ritchie, S. A. & Vosshall, L. B. (2014). “Multimodal integration of carbon dioxide and other sensory cues drives mosquito attraction to humans.” Cell, 156, 1060–1071.
• Enjin, A. et al. (2016). “Humidity sensing in Drosophila.” Current Biology, 26, 1352–1358.
• Yokohari, F. (1978). “Hygroreceptor mechanism in the antenna of the honey bee.” Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 124, 53–60.
• Hedgecock, E. M. & Russell, R. L. (1975). “Normal and mutant thermotaxis in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.” PNAS, 72, 4061–4065.
• Kimura, K. D., Miyawaki, A., Matsumoto, K. & Mori, I. (2004). “The C. elegans thermosensory neuron AFD responds to warming.” Current Biology, 14, 1291–1295.
• Heinrich, B. (1993). The Hot-Blooded Insects, Harvard University Press.
• Weissenböck, N. M. et al. (2010). “TRPV1 gene duplication in penguins.” Naturwissenschaften, 97, 983–988.
• Raymond, C., Matthews, T. & Horton, R. M. (2020). “The emergence of heat and humidity too severe for human tolerance.” Science Advances, 6, eaaw1838.
• Stull, R. (2011). “Wet-bulb temperature from relative humidity and air temperature.” Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 50, 2267–2269.
• Clapham, D. E. & Miller, C. (2011). “A thermodynamic framework for understanding temperature sensing by transient receptor potential (TRP) channels.” PNAS, 108, 19492–19497.
• Montell, C. & Rubin, G. M. (1989). “Molecular characterization of the Drosophila trp locus.” Neuron, 2, 1313–1323.
• McKechnie, A. E. & Wolf, B. O. (2010). “Climate change increases the likelihood of catastrophic avian mortality events during extreme heat waves.” Biology Letters, 6, 253–256.
• Liao, M., Cao, E., Julius, D. & Cheng, Y. (2013). “Structure of the TRPV1 ion channel determined by electron cryo-microscopy.” Nature, 504, 107–112.
• Gao, Y., Cao, E., Julius, D. & Cheng, Y. (2016). “TRPV1 structures in nanodiscs reveal mechanisms of ligand and lipid action.” Nature, 534, 347–351.
• Yin, Y. et al. (2018). “Structure of the cold- and menthol-sensing ion channel TRPM8.” Science, 359, 237–241.
• Paulsen, C. E., Armache, J.-P., Gao, Y., Cheng, Y. & Julius, D. (2015). “Structure of the TRPA1 ion channel suggests regulatory mechanisms.” Nature, 520, 511–517.
• Hellmich, U. A. et al. (2021). “Structural basis of infrared sensing in TRPA1.” Nature Communications, 12, 1–12.
• Descoeur, J. et al. (2011). “Oxaliplatin-induced cold hypersensitivity is due to remodelling of ion channel expression in nociceptors.” EMBO Molecular Medicine, 3, 266–278.
• Kremeyer, B. et al. (2010). “A gain-of-function mutation in TRPA1 causes familial episodic pain syndrome.” Neuron, 66, 671–680.
• Gavva, N. R. et al. (2007). “The vanilloid receptor TRPV1 is tonically activated in vivo and involved in body temperature regulation.” Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 3366–3374.
• Cannon, B. & Nedergaard, J. (2004). “Brown adipose tissue: function and physiological significance.” Physiological Reviews, 84, 277–359.
• Matos-Cruz, V. et al. (2017). “Molecular prerequisites for diminished cold sensitivity in ground squirrels and hamsters.” Cell Reports, 21, 3329–3337.
• Kozak, G. M. et al. (2019). “Heterogeneity of TRPM8 and TRPV1 polymorphisms across human populations.” Molecular Biology and Evolution, 36, 1700–1715.
• Szolcsányi, J. (1982). “Capsaicin-type pungent agents producing pyrexia.” Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, 60, 437–478.