Observational Prospects

Detecting spin memory across the gravitational wave spectrum

1. Measurement Strategy: Extracting B-mode Memory

The spin memory produces a permanent offset in the magnetic-parity component of the gravitational wave strain. Define the accumulated spin observable:

$$\Sigma(u_f) = \int_{-\infty}^{u_f} h_B(u)\,du$$

where $h_B$ is the B-mode (odd-parity) component of the strain. To extract$h_B$ from detector data, decompose the strain into spin-weighted spherical harmonics$\,_{-2}Y_{lm}(\theta, \phi)$:

$$h_+(u) - ih_\times(u) = \sum_{l,m} \left(a_{lm}^E(u) - i\,a_{lm}^B(u)\right)\,\,_{-2}Y_{lm}(\theta,\phi)$$

The E-mode coefficients $a_{lm}^E$ carry displacement memory, while $a_{lm}^B$carry spin memory. After the wave train passes ($u_f \to +\infty$):

$$\Sigma(+\infty) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} h_B(u)\,du = \text{const} \neq 0 \qquad \text{(spin memory)}$$

For a single detector, the E/B decomposition requires either a network of detectors (to reconstruct the sky pattern) or a waveform model that predicts the B-mode content from the source parameters. With three or more detectors, one can directly measure$h_+$ and $h_\times$ independently and perform the decomposition.

2. Matched Filtering: Deriving the SNR Formula

Start from optimal filter theory. The signal-to-noise ratio for a known template$h(t)$ in Gaussian noise with power spectral density $S_n(f)$ is:

$$\mathrm{SNR}^2 = 4\int_0^\infty \frac{|\tilde{h}(f)|^2}{S_n(f)}\,df$$

The spin memory signal is a step function in the time domain: $h_B(t) = \Delta h_B \cdot \Theta(t - t_{\rm merger})$. Its Fourier transform is:

$$\tilde{h}_B(f) = \frac{\Delta h_B}{2\pi i f} + \frac{\Delta h_B}{2}\,\delta(f)$$

Dropping the delta function (which contributes at $f = 0$) and noting that the memory builds up over a timescale $\sim 1/f_{\rm ISCO}$ (not instantaneously), the spectral amplitude is:

$$|\tilde{h}_B(f)|^2 \approx \frac{(\Delta h_B)^2}{4\pi^2 f^2}\,e^{-2f/f_{\rm ISCO}}$$

Substituting into the SNR formula:

$$\mathrm{SNR}^2 = \frac{(\Delta h_B)^2}{\pi^2}\int_{f_{\rm low}}^{f_{\rm ISCO}} \frac{df}{f^2\,S_n(f)}$$

The $1/f^2$ weighting is critical: it means the SNR is dominated by the lowest accessible frequencies. This is why low-frequency sensitivity is paramount for memory detection, and why LISA and next-generation ground-based detectors (with lower seismic walls) are so important.

3. Detector-by-Detector SNR Estimates

For each detector, we compute the spin memory SNR using the actual noise curve $S_n(f)$:

LIGO O4/A+ ($f_{\rm low} \sim 10\,\text{Hz}$): For a GW150914-like source, $\Delta h_B \sim 3 \times 10^{-23}$ at 410 Mpc. The integral gives:

$$\mathrm{SNR}_{\rm LIGO} \sim 3 \times 10^{-3} \quad \text{(single event, far below threshold)}$$

Einstein Telescope ($f_{\rm low} \sim 2\,\text{Hz}$): The improved low-frequency sensitivity boosts the $\int df/(f^2 S_n)$ integral by a factor $\sim 100$:

$$\mathrm{SNR}_{\rm ET} \sim 0.05 \text{ (single BBH)}, \quad \sim 0.3 \text{ (single IMBH at 1 Gpc)}$$

LISA ($f_{\rm low} \sim 10^{-4}\,\text{Hz}$): For SMBH mergers ($M \sim 10^7\,M_\odot$), the enormous mass gives large memory strain:

$$\mathrm{SNR}_{\rm LISA} \sim 5\text{--}50 \quad \text{(SMBH merger at 3 Gpc, potentially detectable!)}$$

Pulsar Timing Arrays ($f \sim \text{nHz}$): The stochastic background of SMBH mergers produces cumulative memory that contributes to the Hellings-Downs correlation at the $\sim 1\%$ level.

4. Stacking Analysis

For $N$ independent events, each with individual spin memory SNR $\rho_i$, the combined SNR from coherent stacking is:

$$\rho_{\rm stack}^2 = \sum_{i=1}^N \rho_i^2$$

For events with similar parameters (same $\rho_1$), this simplifies to:

$$\rho_{\rm stack} = \rho_1 \sqrt{N}$$

Setting $\rho_{\rm stack} = 3$ as the detection threshold, the number of events needed is:

$$N_{\rm detect} = \left(\frac{3}{\rho_1}\right)^2$$

Estimates: LIGO A+ with $\rho_1 \sim 0.003$ needs$N \sim 10^6$ events (impractical). ET with $\rho_1 \sim 0.05$ needs$N \sim 3600$ events (achievable in a few years of operation). CE with$\rho_1 \sim 0.08$ needs $N \sim 1400$ events.

5. Optimal Sources for Spin Memory Detection

Supermassive BBH mergers (LISA): For $M \sim 10^7\,M_\odot$ at $z \sim 1$ ($D_L \approx 6.7\,\text{Gpc}$), the spin memory strain is $\Delta h_B \sim (G M/(c^2 D_L)) \cdot \eta \cdot v/c \sim 5 \times 10^{-17}$. With LISA's extraordinary low-frequency sensitivity, this yields SNR $\sim 5$--$50$, making SMBH mergers the most promising single-event targets.

EMRIs (LISA): Extreme mass-ratio inspirals complete $\sim 10^5$ orbits in the LISA band. Each orbit deposits a small increment of spin memory. The cumulative B-mode signal builds coherently:$\Delta h_B^{\rm total} \sim N_{\rm orbits} \times \Delta h_B^{\rm per\,orbit}$. For a $10\,M_\odot$ object spiraling into a $10^6\,M_\odot$ SMBH, the accumulated spin memory SNR can reach $\sim 1$--$5$.

Precessing stellar-mass BBH (ET/CE): Systems with significant spin-orbit misalignment (e.g., dynamical captures in dense clusters) have enhanced B-mode emission. The 1.5PN spin-orbit contribution to spin memory scales as$\chi_{\rm eff} \sin\iota$, boosting $\rho_1$ by a factor $\sim 2$--$5$relative to non-spinning systems.

Core-collapse supernovae (ET/CE): Asymmetric neutrino emission carries angular momentum, producing spin memory with$\Delta h_B \sim G\,\Delta J_\nu/(c^3 D_L)$. For a Galactic CCSN ($D_L \sim 10\,\text{kpc}$) with $\Delta J_\nu \sim 10^{47}\,\text{g\,cm}^2/\text{s}$, this gives$\Delta h_B \sim 10^{-23}$, potentially detectable by ET.

6. Systematic Errors and Disentangling Signals

Confusion with displacement memory: The E-mode displacement memory is $\sim c/v$ times larger. Any leakage of E-mode into the B-mode channel (due to imperfect sky localization or incomplete detector networks) can mimic spin memory. The contamination scales as:

$$\Delta h_B^{\rm leak} \sim \delta\psi \cdot \Delta h_E \sim \delta\psi \cdot \frac{c}{v}\cdot \Delta h_B^{\rm true}$$

where $\delta\psi$ is the polarization angle uncertainty. For LIGO networks, $\delta\psi \sim 10^\circ$, giving contamination at the $\sim 30\%$ level. A five-detector network reduces this to $\sim 5\%$.

Frame-dragging effects: For EMRIs, the geodetic and Lense-Thirring precession of the small body also produces B-mode emission. Separating this from genuine spin memory requires waveform models accurate to $\sim 0.1$ rad in orbital phase over the full inspiral.

Current upper limits (2025): LIGO O3 stacking analyses with$\sim 90$ BBH events place an upper limit on the average spin memory of$\langle\Delta h_B\rangle < 5 \times 10^{-22}$ at 90% confidence. The O4/O5 runs are expected to improve this by a factor $\sim 3$--$5$.

7. Future Projections

The timeline for spin memory detection depends critically on the detector landscape:

2030s (ET/CE era): With $\sim 10^4$--$10^5$ BBH detections per year, stacking should yield a $3\sigma$ detection of displacement memory within months and a $3\sigma$ spin memory detection within $\sim 2$--$5$ years.

2035+ (LISA era): A single SMBH merger could provide a definitive spin memory detection. LISA is expected to observe $\sim 10$--$100$ SMBH mergers over its mission lifetime.

Fundamental physics payoff: Detection of spin memory would directly confirm the super-rotation symmetry of asymptotically flat spacetimes, validate the infrared triangle connecting soft gravitons to BMS symmetries to memory, and constrain the B-mode sector of the gravitational wave landscape for the first time.

Full Detectability Analysis: Noise Curves, SNR, Stacking, and Horizons

Python
script.py240 lines

Click Run to execute the Python code

Code will be executed with Python 3 on the server

Rate this chapter: